Sign in

Psychosocial assessment in chronic pain

Assessment · G2d · Reviewed by a board-certified pain physician on October 31, 2026

Bottom line

Screen every chronic pain patient for psychosocial risk with brief validated tools, then match care to risk: high-risk back pain needs psychologically informed physiotherapy, and low recovery expectations are a modifiable target.

Key points

  1. Stratify back pain by prognosis. STarT Back assigned low-risk patients a single advice session, medium-risk patients physiotherapy, and high-risk patients psychologically informed physiotherapy addressing psychosocial obstacles to recovery 1.
  2. Stratified care beat best usual care. Roland Morris disability improved more with stratification at 4 months (difference 1.81 points) and 12 months (1.06 points), with QALY gains and cost savings 1.
  3. Screen for depression with PHQ-9. Each of nine DSM-IV criteria scores 0–3; a score of 10 or more had 88% sensitivity and 88% specificity for major depression 2.
  4. Screen for anxiety with GAD-7. The seven-item scale had good reliability and validity, and its optimal cut point gave 89% sensitivity and 82% specificity for generalized anxiety disorder 3.
  5. Ask about expectations. In workers with low back pain, positive return-to-work expectations doubled the adjusted odds of returning; low expectations marked higher risk of long-term work disability 4.
  6. Use professional interpreters. Compared with ad hoc interpreters such as family members, professional interpreters improved communication, use of services, outcomes and satisfaction for patients with limited English proficiency 5.

Watch for

A family member, especially a child, is not an adequate interpreter for history-taking, risk discussion or consent; professional interpreters reduce communication errors and improve comprehension 5.

High-yield for the exam

  • PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mark mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression 2.
  • Anxiety and depression co-occur but are distinct dimensions with independent effects on disability 3.
  • High-risk STarT Back patients had the highest fear-avoidance and HADS anxiety and depression scores at baseline 1.
  • Physiotherapists delivering the high-risk pathway received 6 days of extra training; medium-risk, 3 days 1.
  • With professional interpreters, care quality for limited English proficiency patients approached or equaled that for patients without language barriers 5.
  • The PHQ-9 was validated in 6000 primary care and obstetrics-gynecology patients, with similar results in both settings 2.
  • GAD-7 scores track impairment across all six Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days 3.
  • Rising PHQ-9 severity tracks falling function, more sick days and more health care use 2.

Numbers to know

Item Value
STarT Back trial 851 patients, 2:1 randomization 1
RMDQ difference at 4 months 1.81 points 1
RMDQ difference at 12 months 1.06 points 1
PHQ-9 cut-off for major depression ≥10 (sens 88%, spec 88%) 2
GAD-7 cut point performance sens 89%, spec 82% 3
GAD-7 validation sample 2740 primary care adults 3
Expectations, adjusted odds of return OR 2.01 4

Common traps

  • Giving every back pain patient the same pathway regardless of risk 1.
  • Expecting the stratified-care benefit to stay constant; the effect size fell from 0.32 at 4 months to 0.19 at 12 months 1.
  • Letting a relative interpret consent discussions 5.

Practise this topic

10 more questions on this topic in the full question bank, with explanations and sources.

Sources

  1. Hill JC, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3208163/
  2. Kroenke K, et al. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med, 2001. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11556941/
  3. Spitzer RL, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med, 2006. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16717171/
  4. Sullivan V, et al. Expectations for return to work predict return to work in workers with low back pain: an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. J Occup Rehabil, 2022. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35152369/
  5. Karliner LS, et al. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res, 2007. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1955368/

Related topics

Independent study material for the ABA Pain Medicine exam, written and reviewed by a board-certified pain physician. Not medical advice; not affiliated with the American Board of Anesthesiology.