Low back pain: evaluation and management
Musculoskeletal pain · C4 · Reviewed by a board-certified pain physician on October 31, 2026
Bottom line
Most low back pain is nonspecific and improves with time. Screen for red flags, avoid routine imaging, start with nondrug care, and stratify psychosocial risk; reserve drugs and procedures for selected patients.
Key points
- Screen for serious pathology first. Many guideline red flags barely change probability; a prior history of cancer is the most informative flag for spinal malignancy (post-test probability about 33%) 1. Saddle anesthesia or urinary retention demands emergent MRI for cauda equina syndrome 2.
- Do not image routinely. Imaging without features of a serious condition does not improve outcomes and can cause harm 3. Disc degeneration and bulges are common in pain-free adults and rise with age, so correlate findings with the clinical picture 4.
- Acute pain: nondrug care first. The ACP recommends superficial heat (moderate-quality evidence), massage, acupuncture or spinal manipulation; if a drug is wanted, an NSAID or skeletal muscle relaxant 5. Acetaminophen did not speed recovery from acute low back pain in a large trial 6.
- Chronic pain: active, multimodal treatment. Initial options include exercise, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, acupuncture and mindfulness-based stress reduction (moderate quality), plus tai chi, yoga, CBT and others 5. NSAIDs are first-line drugs; tramadol or duloxetine second-line; opioids only after these fail 5.
- Stratify by psychosocial risk. STarT Back matched low-, medium- and high-risk patients to advice, physiotherapy, or psychologically informed physiotherapy, and improved disability over usual best care at 4 and 12 months 7.
- Recognize inflammatory back pain. ASAS features: improvement with exercise, pain at night, insidious onset, onset before 40, and no improvement with rest; four of five suggests axial spondyloarthritis 8.
Watch for
Saddle anesthesia, new urinary retention or reduced anal tone with leg symptoms means cauda equina syndrome: emergent MRI and urgent decompression, not outpatient follow-up 2.
High-yield for the exam
- A history of malignancy is the red flag with the highest post-test probability for spinal cancer in back pain 1.
- Routine imaging without red flags offers no meaningful benefit and adds cost and harm 3.
- At age 50, most pain-free adults have disc degeneration and a majority have a disc bulge on imaging 4.
- ACP acute low back pain: superficial heat has moderate-quality evidence; NSAIDs or muscle relaxants if drugs are needed 5.
- ACP chronic low back pain: NSAIDs first-line drug, tramadol or duloxetine second-line, opioids last 5.
- High-risk STarT Back patients get psychologically informed physiotherapy, not advice alone 7.
- Improvement with exercise is the strongest single feature of inflammatory back pain (odds ratio 23.1) 8.
Numbers to know
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Post-test probability of malignancy with prior cancer | 33% (95% CI 22–46%) 1 |
| Pain-free adults aged 50 with disc degeneration | about 80% 4 |
| Pain-free adults aged 50 with a disc bulge | about 60% 4 |
| ASAS inflammatory back pain criteria | at least 4 of 5 features 8 |
| ASAS criteria accuracy (expert exercise) | sensitivity 77%, specificity 92% 8 |
| STarT Back disability gain at 12 months | 1.06 Roland Morris points 7 |
Common traps
Practise this topic
- Free question: Nerves to block for lower lumbar facets
- Free question: Urinary retention with new back and leg pain
- Free question: Back pain and fever after injection drug use
- Free question: Interpreting a disc bulge on MRI
- Free question: Fear of movement in chronic back pain
25 more questions on this topic in the full question bank, with explanations and sources.
Sources
- Downie A, et al. Red flags to screen for malignancy and fracture in patients with low back pain: systematic review. BMJ, 2013. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3898572/
- Aduri TT, et al. Cauda equina syndrome: a narrative review exploring the pathophysiology, clinical spectrum, diagnostic strategies, and time-critical management. Cureus, 2026. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13265969/
- Chou R, et al. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med, 2011. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21282698/
- Brinjikji W, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4464797/
- Qaseem A, et al. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med, 2017. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28192789/
- Williams CM, et al. Efficacy of paracetamol for acute low-back pain: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2014. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25064594/
- Hill JC, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3208163/
- Sieper J, et al. New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS). Ann Rheum Dis, 2009. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19147614/
Related topics
Independent study material for the ABA Pain Medicine exam, written and reviewed by a board-certified pain physician. Not medical advice; not affiliated with the American Board of Anesthesiology.