Basivertebral nerve ablation for vertebrogenic pain
Procedural · G4c · Reviewed by a board-certified pain physician on October 31, 2026
Bottom line
Chronic axial low back pain with Modic type 1 or 2 endplate changes at L3–S1 suggests vertebrogenic pain carried by the basivertebral nerve; intraosseous radiofrequency ablation beat sham and standard care at 3 months in selected patients.
Key points
- Vertebrogenic pain is a distinct subtype. It arises from sensitization of the basivertebral nerve within damaged endplates, and Modic type 1 and 2 changes on MRI are the primary selection biomarkers 1.
- Know the anatomy. The basivertebral nerve, usually paired, arises from the sinuvertebral nerves and enters the vertebral body posteriorly through the central vascular foramen, running with the basivertebral vessels 1.
- Read the Modic types. Type 1 is endplate marrow edema (low T1, high T2); type 2 is fatty conversion (high T1 and T2); type 3 is sclerosis (low on both) 1.
- Selection criteria are specific. Axial pain over 6 months, at least 6 months of failed conservative care, Modic 1 or 2 changes at L3–S1, Oswestry Disability Index at least 30 and pain at least 4/10 1.
- It beat sham. In the sham-controlled trial of 225 patients, ODI fell 20.5 points with ablation versus 15.2 with sham at 3 months, with 75.6% versus 55.3% responders 2.
- It beat standard care. In a 140-patient open-label randomized trial at 20 US sites, interim analysis showed clear superiority over standard care for ODI change at 3 months 3.
Watch for
High-yield for the exam
- The basivertebral nerve innervates endplate nociceptors thought to generate chronic low back pain 2.
- In the long-term cohort, 85% of treated patients were available at a mean 6.4 years 5.
- SMART patients had a mean age of 47 and mean baseline ODI of 42 2.
- The responder threshold in the sham trial was an ODI decrease of at least 10 points 2.
- The standard-care trial's primary endpoint was the 3-month between-arm change in ODI 3.
- In the treatment arm followed long term, ODI improved from 42.8 to 16.9 at a mean 6.4 years, with a 75% composite responder rate 5.
- Emerging reports describe use beyond original criteria, such as multilevel Modic changes and osteoporosis 1.
- Disc degeneration is present in 37% of pain-free 20-year-olds and 96% of pain-free 80-year-olds 4.
Numbers to know
Common traps
Practise this topic
1 more question on this topic in the full question bank, with explanations and sources.
Sources
- Romano DG, et al. Vertebrogenic low back pain and basivertebral nerve ablation: a review of mechanisms, imaging-driven selection, and clinical outcomes. Diagnostics (Basel), 2026. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13297703/
- Fischgrund JS, et al. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a prospective randomized double-blind sham-controlled multi-center study. Eur Spine J, 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29423885/
- Khalil JG, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Spine J, 2019. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31229663/
- Brinjikji W, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4464797/
- Fischgrund JS, et al. Long-term outcomes following intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: 5-year treatment arm results from a prospective randomized double-blind sham-controlled multi-center study. Eur Spine J, 2020. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32451777/
Related topics
Independent study material for the ABA Pain Medicine exam, written and reviewed by a board-certified pain physician. Not medical advice; not affiliated with the American Board of Anesthesiology.