Regenerative injections: PRP, stem cells and prolotherapy
Musculoskeletal pain · C4 · Reviewed by a board-certified pain physician on October 31, 2026
Bottom line
For knee and hip osteoarthritis the evidence-based injection is intra-articular glucocorticoid; PRP and stem cells are strongly recommended against, and no injectable has been shown to rebuild cartilage.
Key points
- Glucocorticoid is the injection the guideline backs. The 2019 ACR/Arthritis Foundation guideline strongly recommends intra-articular glucocorticoid for knee and hip OA and conditionally prefers it over other intra-articular agents because its evidence is of considerably higher quality 1.
- PRP is strongly recommended against. For knee and hip OA, the ACR cites heterogeneity and lack of standardized preparations, so it is often unclear exactly what is injected 1.
- PRP does not regrow cartilage. In RESTORE, 288 adults with medial knee OA received three weekly leukocyte-poor PRP or saline injections; at 12 months neither pain nor medial tibial cartilage volume differed 2.
- Structural meta-analysis agrees. A 2026 meta-analysis of 12 trials found limited and inconsistent PRP effects on imaging-based structure, with no consistent benefit for medial tibial cartilage or defect progression 3.
- Other injectables also fall short. The ACR strongly recommends against stem cell injections for knee or hip OA and conditionally against prolotherapy and intra-articular botulinum toxin, citing small trials and small or absent effects 1.
- Bisphosphonates in CRPS: modest and short-lived. A 2026 meta-analysis of 11 placebo-controlled trials found bisphosphonates may reduce CRPS pain at more than 4 weeks to 3 months, with little or no difference at 3–6 months and probably more adverse events 4.
Watch for
High-yield for the exam
- Hyaluronic acid is conditionally recommended against for knee OA and strongly recommended against for hip OA 1.
- When restricted to low risk-of-bias trials, the hyaluronic acid effect versus saline approaches zero 1.
- Ultrasound guidance is strongly recommended for hip joint glucocorticoid injection 1.
- RESTORE pain change at 12 months: −2.1 with PRP versus −1.8 with saline, a non-significant difference 2.
- Of 31 RESTORE secondary outcomes, 29 showed no between-group difference 2.
- Bisphosphonate CRPS trials were 97% type I and included formulations not approved in the US, such as neridronate and clodronate 4.
- The ACR makes no PRP, stem cell or prolotherapy recommendation for hand OA because they have not been evaluated there 1.
Numbers to know
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| RESTORE sample | 288 participants, 3 weekly injections 2 |
| RESTORE cartilage volume change | −1.4% PRP vs −1.2% saline 2 |
| PRP structural meta-analysis | 12 trials 3 |
| Bisphosphonate CRPS trials | 11 trials, 754 participants 4 |
| Short-term CRPS pain difference | about 10 points on 0–100 4 |
| Adverse event risk ratio | 1.1 (moderate certainty) 4 |
Common traps
- Calling PRP "conditionally recommended" for knee OA; it is strongly recommended against 1.
- Assuming leukocyte-poor PRP preserved cartilage in RESTORE 2.
- Choosing stem cells as a safer "natural" option; the ACR also strongly recommends against them 1.
- Treating bisphosphonates as durable CRPS therapy; medium- and long-term benefit is not shown 4.
Practise this topic
3 more questions on this topic in the full question bank, with explanations and sources.
Sources
- Kolasinski SL, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2020. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10518852/
- Bennell KL, et al. Effect of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Placebo Injection on Pain and Medial Tibial Cartilage Volume in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: The RESTORE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34812863/
- Pasqualotto E, et al. Platelet-rich plasma for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2026. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13690889/
- Ferraro MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med, 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41397259/
Related topics
Independent study material for the ABA Pain Medicine exam, written and reviewed by a board-certified pain physician. Not medical advice; not affiliated with the American Board of Anesthesiology.