Sign in

Anticoagulants and antiplatelets for interventional pain procedures

Procedural · G4a · Reviewed by a board-certified pain physician on November 2, 2026

Bottom line

Classify the procedure's bleeding risk first: neuromodulation implants, intrathecal pumps, deep sympathetic blocks and vertebral augmentation are high risk and need antithrombotic interruption, while low-risk procedures often proceed without stopping therapy.

Key points

  1. High-risk procedures can paralyze. ASRA-led and ASIPP guidelines class spinal cord stimulator trials and implants as high bleeding risk because epidural hematoma can cause permanent paralysis 12.
  2. ASIPP's high-risk list is broad. It includes deep sympathetic blocks and neurolysis (stellate, splanchnic, celiac, lumbar sympathetic, hypogastric), intrathecal implants, vertebral augmentation and percutaneous decompression 2.
  3. DOAC holds differ by society. For high-risk procedures ASIPP stops DOACs for 2 days (1 day for intermediate risk), longer for dabigatran with CrCl below 50; ASRA advises a 3-day apixaban hold, restarting about 24 hours later 23.
  4. Warfarin is managed by INR. ASIPP accepts INR ≤3.0 for low-risk, ≤2.0 for intermediate-risk and <1.5 for high-risk procedures, stopping warfarin 3–5 days for the last 2.
  5. Antiplatelets have fixed intervals. ASIPP stops clopidogrel and prasugrel 6 days and ticagrelor 5 days for high-risk procedures; aspirin is stopped 6 days for high risk but may continue for lower tiers 2.
  6. Bridge only when thrombotic risk is high. ASIPP allows LMWH bridging for high thromboembolic risk, stopped 24 hours before the procedure; PAUSE showed DOAC interruption without bridging had low bleeding and stroke rates 24.

Watch for

Unexpected pain at the injection site with rapid neurologic deterioration suggests epidural hematoma: confirm with MRI and obtain urgent neurosurgical consultation to avoid permanent neurologic sequelae 2.

High-yield for the exam

  • ASIPP restarts antithrombotics 12–24 hours after intermediate-risk and 24–48 hours after high-risk procedures, depending on bleeding 2.
  • With high thromboembolic risk, ASIPP allows resuming therapy 12 hours after the intervention 2.
  • For low-risk procedures, ASIPP allows DOACs to continue 2.
  • PAUSE omitted DOACs 1 day before low-risk and 2 days before high-risk procedures, without heparin bridging or coagulation testing 4.
  • In PAUSE, 30-day major bleeding was 1.35% with apixaban and 1.85% with rivaroxaban 4.
  • CHEST's 2022 guideline issued 44 recommendations, only two strong, including against bridging in atrial fibrillation 5.
  • SSRIs raise bleeding risk, but ASIPP notes stopping them can trigger depressive relapse, so guidance is controversial 2.
  • Most NSAIDs other than aspirin may be held 1–2 days, some 4–10 days, for moderate and high-risk procedures 2.

Numbers to know

Item Value
ASIPP DOAC hold, high risk 2 days 2
ASRA apixaban hold, high risk 3 days 3
ASIPP warfarin target, high risk INR <1.5 2
Clopidogrel hold, high risk 6 days 2
Ticagrelor hold, high risk 5 days 2
LMWH bridge stop 24 h before procedure 2
PAUSE cohort 3007 patients with atrial fibrillation 4

Common traps

  • Continuing clopidogrel through a high-risk neuraxial implant 2.
  • Reflexively bridging atrial fibrillation patients; CHEST strongly recommends against heparin bridging in atrial fibrillation 5.
  • Mixing society intervals: ASIPP and ASRA give different DOAC hold times for the same high-risk procedure 23.
  • Using pain-procedure intervals for epidural or peripheral catheters; the separate ASRA regional anesthesia guideline (fifth edition, 2025) covers those 6.

Practise this topic

3 more questions on this topic in the full question bank, with explanations and sources.

Sources

  1. Narouze S, et al. Interventional spine and pain procedures in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications (second edition): guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29278603/
  2. Manchikanti L, et al. Perioperative management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients undergoing interventional techniques: 2024 updated guidelines from the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). Pain Physician, 2024. painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=Nzg3NQ%3D%3D&jo
  3. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Updates to the ASRA guidelines for interventional pain procedures. ASRA Pain Medicine News, 2019. asra.com/guidelines-articles/original-articles/article-item/
  4. Douketis JD, et al. Perioperative management of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving a direct oral anticoagulant. JAMA Intern Med, 2019. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31380891/
  5. Douketis JD, et al. Executive summary: perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: an American College of Chest Physicians clinical practice guideline. Chest, 2022. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35964703/
  6. Kopp SL, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine evidence-based guidelines (fifth edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2025. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39880411/

Related topics

Independent study material for the ABA Pain Medicine exam, written and reviewed by a board-certified pain physician. Not medical advice; not affiliated with the American Board of Anesthesiology.